Friday, September 30, 2016

To see or not to see (Part I)

Will it ever be possible to restore vision to a patient of Norrie disease?
 
I think at some point of time it will be. I don’t know if this will happen in my lifetime, but the research leading up to it is certainly very fascinating.
 
There appear to be two problems which need to be addressed. Firstly, the optics in the eye, i.e. the detached retina, and secondly, the neuronal circuitry in the visual cortex (the part of the brain which is responsible for seeing).
 
In this post, I talk about the first problem. The problem relating to the visual cortex will be taken up in a subsequent post.
 
[Aside: Although in a typical case of Norrie the blindness is complete (i.e. no light perception), there are a few cases of Norrie in our online community where the affected person has some light perception. It is probable that the neuronal circuitry in these individuals is well developed and so that would be one less problem to worry about in this subset of the community.]
 
To restore the visual circuitry in the eye, we would either have to put a new retina in place, or come up with a solution which bypasses the retina. Going by current research, there appear to be the following 3 possibilities: 
  • Cortical implant
  • Retina transplant
  • Whole eye transplant (no, I’m not joking, there is such a project underway)
 
 
Cortical implant
 
This approach to restoring vision bypasses the eye (& the optic nerve) completely.
 
Cortical implants (also known as IntraCortical Visual Prostheses – ICVPs) aim to provide patients with visual information by stimulating neurons in the brain’s visual areas. An ICVP comprises a digital camera on a glasses frame. The camera is connected (either by a wire or wirelessly) to a small computerized vision processor, which is kept in a pocket or worn on a belt. Images from the camera are transmitted to the processor which in turn converts them into waveform patterns, which are then transmitted wirelessly to the implant in the brain. The implant is typically a chip that is implanted into the visual cortex (located at the back of the brain).
 
It must be stated that a cortical implant will provide “artificial” vision - a pixelated version allowing the user to perform elementary visual tasks such as navigation and object recognition. Depending on the number of electrodes on the implant, it might even allow for reading large print and recognizing people.
 
Groups developing ICVPs include the following:  
A press release from Second Sight states that the first human clinical trials are planned to commence by the end of the first quarter of 2017.
 
Human trials for the Monash University’s ICVP are expected to take place sometime in 2016 according to an article published in the Sydney Morning Herald.
 
The above list is not exhaustive. ICVPs are being created by a few other groups as well. One such group is the Visual Prosthesis Lab at Massachusetts General Hospital. A notable difference here is that this group proposes to implant the electrodes in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and not the visual cortex. The LGN is a relay center on the visual pathway. It is located in the thalamus (a structure in the middle of the brain). We can think of the visual pathway like this:
 
Retina --------- LGN --------- Visual Cortex
 
There are pros and cons of this approach versus the one which places the implant on the visual cortex. One obvious difficulty is in getting to the LGN since it is located deep inside the brain, whereas the visual cortex, being located at the back of the brain, is easily accessed. 
 
 
Retina transplant
 
Researchers have succeeded in creating functional three-dimensional retinal organoids using stem-cells.
  
An organoid is a three-dimensional organ-bud grown in vitro that shows realistic micro-anatomy. The technique for growing organoids has rapidly improved since the early 2010s, and it was named by The Scientist as one of the biggest scientific advancements of 2013.

[Source: Wikipedia]

 
 
The organoids show the architectural organization of the retina, and include functioning photoreceptor cells capable of responding to light.
 
However, in order to have a retinal model which resembles the real thing, the lab grown organoid needs to (1) include a network of blood vessels, and (2) be able to transmit the electrical impulses which can be interpreted by the brain as images. Once this happens - or if this happens - retina transplantation will perhaps become a reality.
 
Researchers who have successfully created retinal organoids:  
  • Dr. Masayo Takahashi, Professor of ophthalmology, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan
         Media coverage:
         Media coverage: 
         Mini-Retina Created with Stem Cells, June 2014 
         Light-Sensing Retina in a Dish, June 2014   
  • Dr. Mike O. Karl, Research Group Leader, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany  
         Media coverage: 
 
 
 
Whole eye transplant
 
The U.S. Department of Defense has awarded $1.25 million to University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (UPMC) researchers co-led by McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine faculty members Dr. Vijay Gorantla, associate professor of surgery in the Department of Plastic Surgery at the University of Pittsburgh and the administrative medical director of the Pittsburgh Reconstructive Transplant Program at UPMC, and Dr. Joel Schuman, chair of the Department of Ophthalmology, Pitt School of Medicine, and director of the UPMC Eye Center, to establish the groundwork for the nation’s first whole-eye transplantation program. 
 
The Pitt researchers will lead a multidisciplinary consortium (dubbed the Audacious Restorative Goals in Ocular Sciences (ARGOS) Consortium) that includes clinicians and scientists from Harvard University and the University of California, San Diego.  
 
In the following excerpt from an article published online, Dr. Jeffrey Goldberg, director of research at the Shiley Eye Center at University of California, San Diego, and Dr. Vijay Gorantla talk about the main problem with a whole eye transplant, that of reconnecting the optic nerve: 
 
"The chief problem," Goldberg explained, "is that when you switch out an eyeball you have to completely cut all connections between the optic nerve and the eye. So then you need to reconnect the donor eye's nerve fibers back to the recipient's brain in order to achieve vision restoration. But we know that once you make that cut, the nerve fibers just do not regrow on their own. That doesn't happen automatically." 
 
"That's what distinguishes an eye transplant from most other types of transplants," Gorantla added. In other organ transplants, the chief hurdle is simply reconnecting a proper blood supply. "For example, if you get the plumbing connected and the blood going, then a transplanted heart will beat in the recipient patient immediately," Gorantla said. 
 
"But an eye transplant actually has more parallels with a hand or face transplant," he said. The eye may appear healthy because of a renewed blood supply, but without reconnecting the optic nerve, "there's no motor activity and no sensation or eyesight," Gorantla said. "The result is functionless and lifeless." 
 
Luckily, various laboratories "have made significant progress" in fostering the long distance regrowth of nerve fibers, Goldberg said. "In animals with optic nerve injury or degeneration we've even started to see fibers regrow all the way back to the brain," he noted. 
 
You can read more about this project by clicking on the following links: 
 
UPMC exploring future of eye transplants - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, July 2015 
Second Sight - Science Magazine, March 2015
 
 
And with that I wrap up today's post. 
 
Till next time then, 
 
Meenu.

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Where it all began


This week I’m heading to Zurich to meet Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Berger, Director, Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics, Medical Faculty, University of Zurich.

Prof. Berger is no stranger to the Norrie community, having presented the advances made by researchers studying the norrin protein at the 2009 & 2012 international conferences organized by the NDA. His lab has a longstanding interest in Norrie disease. The lab boasts two important 'firsts' - the gene for Norrie disease was first identified here in 1992 by positional cloning and the first mouse model for the disease was generated in the lab in 1996. Click here to see the Norrie disease research webpage at the Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics‘ website.

As I have yet to attend an NDA conference, this is the first time I will be meeting Prof. Berger. This is an amazing opportunity and I intend to make the most of it. My list of questions and stuff to discuss is growing by the minute!

Till next time then,
Meenu.

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

A little bit of hope


A few months back, I sat down to watch the proceedings of the 3rd international Norrie disease conference held in August, 2015 in Boston.

I listened to Dr. Xin Ye’s presentation on Norrin/Frizzled-4 signaling in vascular development and maintenance. This covered research conducted by the Nathans lab at Howard Hughes Medical Institute, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, over a period of many years.

As the presentation inched towards the final few slides, I sat riveted to my seat. One of the results of the research study was making me want to whoop with joy.

No, wait, I thought. Perhaps I’ve got it all wrong. Rewind. Listen to it again. 

Nope, I hadn’t made a mistake.

Even so I found it hard to believe. It was time to go online and dig out the research study corresponding to the latter part of the presentation.

If you’re still reading, here is what this is all about:

The Norrie gene (NDP) codes for the protein Norrin. Norrin attaches to another protein called Frizzled-4. The two proteins fit together like a key in a lock. When Norrin attaches (binds) to Frizzled-4, it initiates a pathway called the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. This in turn promotes certain target genes. The genes that Norrin helps activate are implicated in maintaining the blood brain barrier (BBB) (amongst other things). 

The blood brain barrier allows substances such as glucose and oxygen to enter the brain but blocks toxic substances from getting into the brain.

What is the blood brain barrier?

Dr. Nathans explains that, normally, the cells which line the inside of blood vessels (endothelial cells) contain permeable "windows" and relatively loose "bolts" connecting the cells together. In the brain and retina, endothelial cells have no "windows" and their "bolts" connect them tightly. "We now know that endothelial cells that make up the blood-brain barrier have to receive signals constantly from nearby brain or retinal cells telling them, 'You're in the brain. Tighten your bolts and close your windows.'" This reinforcement of the endothelial cells is what is known as the blood brain barrier.
[Source: ScienceDaily]

A compromised blood brain barrier leads to neuronal damage and disturbed brain function.

This should explain the cognitive impairment and autistic traits seen in some Norrie cases.

Additionally, as I have seen numerous studies linking blood brain barrier dysfunction to seizures and epilepsy, I’m guessing that the seizures and epilepsy experienced by some Norrie patients are also an outcome of the loss of integrity of the blood brain barrier. Click here to see one such study.

So. Back to the Nathans lab research.

Simply put, this research establishes that supplying Norrin to the brain in adult Norrie mice completely restores the integrity of the blood brain barrier.

In other words, OH MY GOD. This could be the solution to all the brain related problems associated with Norrie disease. (There are lots of other very significant findings of this study, and I hope to bring them up in subsequent blog posts).

Three cheers for the Nathans lab for this brilliant research!

So, um, where is it, this wonder drug?

I have come to understand from Prof. Nathans that this matter is under consideration by the lab, and that the problem which needs resolving is how best to deliver the drug to the brain.

How much longer before we have a viable treatment?

Till next time then,

Meenu.